РЕКЛАМА
ИНФОРМАЦИЯ
Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru

ПРОЦЕССОРЫ

CPU Performance from Socket 7 to Slot 1
Краткое содержание статьи: A comparison of all currently available PC CPUs was more than overdue and although it's a horrible amount of work I felt forced to finally do one after Intel released not only a CPU for the high end but as well for the low end market

CPU Performance from Socket 7 to Slot 1


Редакция THG,  16 апреля 1998
Назад
Вы читаете страницу 1 из 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Далее


Introduction

A comparison of all currently available PC CPUs was more than overdue and although it's a horrible amount of work I felt forced to finally do one after Intel released not only a CPU for the high end but as well for the low end market. This performance comparison should give you some help deciding which kind of system you will buy or put together or in which direction your next upgrade is going to go.

The office application performance was measured with Ziff Davis' Winstone 98. Winstone 98 is using more recent software than Winstone 97 and possibly the way ZDBOp is weighing the different applications has changed, because non Intel CPUs perform worse in Winstone 98 than they did in Winstone 97 if you compare their scores against Intel CPUs. The 6x86MX suffered the worst impact, whilst a 6x86MX used to reach pretty much the same Business Winstone score as a Pentium II at the same PR-rating it is quite a way behind Pentium II CPUs in Winstone 98 now. Winstone 98 runs about 40 min., performimg two siutes of 'task switching', which is mainly responsible for the length of the benchmark run. I was very surprised finding out that the task switching benchmarks don't influence the Winstone score at all though. Database software and word processors have the highest weighing for the final score.

For testing the performance of the CPU's floating point unit I used 3D Studio Max, taking the time the system needed to render a scene. 3D Studio Max or 3D Studio Max 2 are still the number one rendering engines used and they obviously don't require that much of main memory or Level 2 cache performance, which is why the Celeron scored almost as well as the Pentium II.

For gaming I planned using Id's Quake II, Rage's Incoming and Acclaim's Forsaken, but I found out that Forsaken scales exactly the same as Incoming so that I used the special benchmark version of Incoming that Rage was nice enough to make for me. This special gem is a lot easier to run than Forsaken. The benchmarks will show that Incoming depends pretty heavily on L2 cache speed, whilst Quake II still mainly focusses on FPU performance. Hence Incoming benefits quite a bit more from higher bus speeds than Quake II does.
Назад
Вы читаете страницу 1 из 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Далее


СОДЕРЖАНИЕ

Обсуждение в Клубе Экспертов THG Обсуждение в Клубе Экспертов THG


РЕКЛАМА
РЕКОМЕНДУЕМ ПРОЧЕСТЬ!

История мейнфреймов: от Harvard Mark I до System z10 EC
Верите вы или нет, но были времена, когда компьютеры занимали целые комнаты. Сегодня вы работаете за небольшим персональным компьютером, но когда-то о таком можно было только мечтать. Предлагаем окунуться в историю и познакомиться с самыми знаковыми мейнфреймами за последние десятилетия.

Пятнадцать процессоров Intel x86, вошедших в историю
Компания Intel выпустила за годы существования немало процессоров x86, начиная с эпохи расцвета ПК, но не все из них оставили незабываемый след в истории. В нашей первой статье цикла мы рассмотрим пятнадцать наиболее любопытных и памятных процессоров Intel, от 8086 до Core 2 Duo.

ССЫЛКИ
Реклама от YouDo
По ссылке https://youdo.com/lp-remont-blendera-Kenwood/, смотрите ссылку.
Здесь https://youdo.com/lp-tv24063/ - посетить сайт .
Домработница в Железнодорожном на http://personal.youdo.com/housekeeper/geo/geleznodorogniy/.