РЕКЛАМА
ИНФОРМАЦИЯ
ПОЛЕЗНЫЕ ССЫЛКИ
Lord Kryo - Part 2: 24 CPU Coolers in Review

Lord Kryo Puts His Hands on 17 Coolers

Processors On The Rocks - Asetek's VapoChill

Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru

ПРОЦЕССОРЫ

Can
Краткое содержание статьи: Gone are the days when a primitively designed CPU cooler with a minimal price tag would fit the bill for a PC system. We tested the latest generation of coolers, which perform their job much more efficiently. The bottom line - more complex construction, more detailed design, but also a heftier price tag.

Can't Touch This! -<BR>A Comparison of 46 CPU Coolers


Редакция THG,  21 мая 2001
Назад
Вы читаете страницу 33 из 36
Далее


Specific Cooling Performance - Swiftech Duo Still in the Lead


Specific Cooling Performance - Swiftech Duo Still in the Lead

Specific cooling performance C/W is a gauge for the quality of a cooler.

Specific cooling performance denotes the quality of a cooler - the smaller the value is, the better the cooling effect is. In general, specific cooling performance scores are related to the temperature readings. The winner in previous tests, the Swiftech MC462, attains a C/W score of 0.16, putting it once again squarely at the top of the pack. This positions it a considerable distance ahead of its brother, the Swiftech MC370-0A, which was la crиme de la crиme in the first group tested. Of the newcomer coolers, the Blizzard Thunderbird has entered very high on the performance totem pole. Its C/W of 0.31 puts it on a par with the excellent Silverado from Noise Control. The Global Win CAK 38's cooling performance, a C/W of 0.33, is equally good. In general, we can say that

If specific cooling performance is somewhere between 0.35 and 0.4, this indicates a really decent cooler-fan system. Scores below 0.35 are very good; below 0.20, they're top-notch.

The upper echelon still includes the two Swiftech models, which placed first and second. The MC462 was designed for use with the new Pentium 4, which has to meet entirely new requirements for thermal behavior.

The scores of the last models in this chart put them entirely out of the question - the Smart Cooler is the new laggard with a C/W score of 0.69. If it comes to this, then it's hardly even worthwhile installing a cooler. All coolers with C/W scores above 0.57 are fully unsuitable for both overclocking and for AMD Athlon CPUs faster than 1000 MHz. At this point, we would like to mention that all scores were obtained using our reference configuration. Although using these coolers in another system could lead to slightly different results, these deviations shouldn't be significant.
Назад
Вы читаете страницу 33 из 36
Далее



СОДЕРЖАНИЕ

Обсуждение в Клубе Экспертов THG Обсуждение в Клубе Экспертов THG


РЕКЛАМА
РЕКОМЕНДУЕМ ПРОЧЕСТЬ!

История мейнфреймов: от Harvard Mark I до System z10 EC
Верите вы или нет, но были времена, когда компьютеры занимали целые комнаты. Сегодня вы работаете за небольшим персональным компьютером, но когда-то о таком можно было только мечтать. Предлагаем окунуться в историю и познакомиться с самыми знаковыми мейнфреймами за последние десятилетия.

Пятнадцать процессоров Intel x86, вошедших в историю
Компания Intel выпустила за годы существования немало процессоров x86, начиная с эпохи расцвета ПК, но не все из них оставили незабываемый след в истории. В нашей первой статье цикла мы рассмотрим пятнадцать наиболее любопытных и памятных процессоров Intel, от 8086 до Core 2 Duo.

ССЫЛКИ