32 Graphic Card Meltdown - Part One

3dfx, Matrox and Nvidia take on the KryoTech Cool Athlon 800MHz

Review of the Matrox G400 MAX

3DNow! Enabled 3D Adapters - Which solution offers the best performance?

3D Chips and Cards

NVIDIA rocks the Boat with TNT2

Preview of 3Dfx Voodoo3

First Look at ATI's Rage 128

Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru


32 Graphic Card Meltdown - Part Two
Краткое содержание статьи: In this review you can get enough performance information to decide who's the current card on the market for you. See who's the real performance leader for today's most grueling 3D software tests.

32 Graphic Card Meltdown - Part Two

Редакция THG,  6 сентября 1999
Вы читаете страницу 1 из 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26


Due to popular demand I've altered my plan to bring you the performance information on all the cards last. Part two has now changed into the hardware performance section. Due to availability changes, a couple of cards were taken out of the review and a two were added on. I will update the driver screenshots for the added cards as soon as possible. The last part will now be the hardware/software accessories section. I think everyone will be happier this way since I will now have more time to review the variety of featured hardware/software accessories that all these cards have. I will try to cover a few added topics in part 3 that you, the readers, have brought to my attention. Enough talk about the changes and onto the review :).

Before I get into my analysis I want to clarify a problem that I run into when we do a performance comparison. Not everyone has the exact same needs. I have set minimum criteria for performance on this particular review and I will stand by it when I start to critique cards. You might have a different opinion on this and that is perfectly fine if it suits YOUR needs! Make sure to keep this in mind throughout this review. My rule of thumb currently for hardware performance is 30 FPS on average at 1024x768x16. This is a performance level that I think most of you would expect from a card that you would buy now, if not more.

While the benchmarks were being run, I was already starting to see things I really disliked and felt were unacceptable. Some of the cards had visual defects or didn't run every test without crashing. Below each of the performance charts I will explain any visual defects or failures to run the test. It seemed that most of the problems were limitations of the given chipset driver or the card frame buffer size. I also experienced poor visual quality on quite a few of the tests, which bothered me. I expected this problem to happen when testing the OpenGL ICD benchmarks but not the DirectX tests. I will also note when I saw these issues.
Вы читаете страницу 1 из 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26


Обсуждение в Клубе Экспертов THG Обсуждение в Клубе Экспертов THG


История мейнфреймов: от Harvard Mark I до System z10 EC
Верите вы или нет, но были времена, когда компьютеры занимали целые комнаты. Сегодня вы работаете за небольшим персональным компьютером, но когда-то о таком можно было только мечтать. Предлагаем окунуться в историю и познакомиться с самыми знаковыми мейнфреймами за последние десятилетия.

Пятнадцать процессоров Intel x86, вошедших в историю
Компания Intel выпустила за годы существования немало процессоров x86, начиная с эпохи расцвета ПК, но не все из них оставили незабываемый след в истории. В нашей первой статье цикла мы рассмотрим пятнадцать наиболее любопытных и памятных процессоров Intel, от 8086 до Core 2 Duo.

Реклама от YouDo
Задача 'http://personal.youdo.com/st287856/' на YouDo.
Дизайн рекламной продукции, http://freelance.youdo.com/polygraphy/other/reklamnaya/other/.