ВИДЕОКАРТЫ

Редакция THG,  18 июня 2001 Вы читаете страницу 1 из 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

introduction

We had only one day left until the end of Computex 2001, but our work never seemed to end. It was worth it. We managed to get you the scoop on AMD's 760MP, NVIDIA's nForce, and even a breakthrough on Tualatin.

So, how could we resist reviewing two new 3D graphics chips which weren't stamped either NVIDIA or ATI? We headed for lab in Taipei, and had less than a day to give the SiS 315 and Trident Blade XP a run through our benchmark tests.

NVIDIA's pace in introducing new technology is giving the industry a hard time so, Trident and SiS are both trying to gain market share by concentrating on a strong price/performance ratio - they don't even try to compete with NVIDIA or ATI in the mid or high-end sectors of the market. As a result, although you won't find these chips a must have for hard core gaming, or high-end industrial design, they do offer an attractive price, and a very strong focus on a particular segment of the market. We categorize Trident's Blade XP and the SiS 315 as both targeting NVIDIA's MX 200 as well as ATI's Radeon VE. Definitely worth taking a look at how these two chips perform.

Вы читаете страницу 1 из 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

СОДЕРЖАНИЕ |Одной страницей|Версия для печати

introduction SiS 315 Trident Blade XP Test Setup Benchmarks Conclusion  Обсуждение в Клубе Экспертов THG